Subrogation is one of the few loss mitigation levers available after a claim has been paid, and most carriers are not pulling it hard enough.
The fundamental challenge is organizational: subrogation sits at the end of the claims process, after the immediate pressures of the loss event have resolved and attention has moved on. It requires legal expertise, investigative resources, and systematic case management — and it competes for budget against functions that seem more urgent.
The carriers recovering the most in subrogation treat it not as a collections function but as a legal recovery function with its own strategic priority and dedicated resources. They identify subrogation potential early in the claims process — sometimes at FNOL — and tag files for recovery review before closure, rather than trying to reconstruct cases after the adjuster has moved on.
Modern analytics can also improve subrogation yield by identifying patterns in losses that have recovery potential, prioritizing cases by expected recovery value, and flagging vendor or manufacturer liability indicators that a human review might miss in a high-volume file environment.
Run an analysis of your subrogation recovery rate as a percentage of recoverable losses and benchmark it against industry peers. The gap you find is probably larger than you expect — and it is actionable.
#Subrogation #ClaimsManagement #InsuranceProfitability #LossRecovery #PAndCInsurance